Talk:Everyone Talks/@comment-26268104-20150530205817/@comment-6794436-20150530235319

You seem to not understand the situation that happened. In the first Sophia Show, I did my review like I normally did, even despite the grotesque, shitty nature of the pasta, not directly insulting the author. Then he made a sequel, which was almost worse than the original. At that point, I threw a few jabs at the author, but nothing really that insulting.

After the second pasta, we tried giving the author advice, which he ignored, we warned him not to make a sequel, which he ignored, we told him we'd ban him if he made something that horrible again, which he ignored. He ignored everything we did to try and help him, and wrote a horribly grotesque third story, and at that point, myself and the rest of the wiki were just done with his bullshit. So I just unloaded on him, and it was admittedly funny. In that review I wasn't trying to point out the flaws, because I'd already done that to him two times prior to that review, and I wasn't going to waste my time trying to tell him what he did wrong because I knew he wouldn't listen.

Also, once again, that post is just there for comedic purposes only. Both to show how extremely bad the pasta was, and to look back on how both humerous and enraging the whole ordeal was.