Thread:Sir Areis Lionheart/@comment-4750363-20130605200903

Eeeeeh...first things first: I'm not doing this with the intent of causing drama, or...something similar, and I deeply apologize if it causes the wrong impression. That isn't my intention.

The purpose of this message is, first than all, warn about a vandal, and second, try to clear a misunderstanding that happened.

---

Recently, this user (http://someordinarygamers.wikia.com/wiki/Special:Contributions/LOLSKELETONS) came to this Wiki following the trail of a vandal that has vandalized the Creepypasta Wiki and the Trollpasta Wiki, along with many other Wikis related to creepypastas.

This is the IP from the user:

http://someordinarygamers.wikia.com/wiki/User:75.65.123.61?action=history

And the name of the vandal: http://someordinarygamers.wikia.com/wiki/Special:Contributions/Ronnierocks888

It is known that this guy is a vandal and a spammer, as demonstrated by the banning performed by Kefke Wren, indicating the user created Spam Pages, and if needed, I can link to his same vandal's actions in the Creepypasta Wiki and the Trollpasta Wiki:

http://someordinarygamers.wikia.com/wiki/Special:Contributions/75.65.123.61

---

Now, the problem that happened is that LOLSKELETONS fixed a loophole in the Deletion template, and reversed a vandalism made by the aforementioned user, Ronnierocks.

And what was one of the Admins reaction?

To ban LOLSKELETONS and leave the vandal unbanned, along with leaving this message as the reason: (Don't come acting like you're all high and mighty here. You're not an admin on THIS here wiki.)

Here is the proof: http://someordinarygamers.wikia.com/wiki/Special:Contributions/LOLSKELETONS

To be honest, it seems like jeopardy to ban for an indefinite time the user who tried to stop the vandal and NOT the vandal himself...and to make matters worse, it seems that the Admin that executed the ban had personal reasons for doing it, as demonstrated by the message left.

I reckon that Admin Kefke Wren did the right thing and banned the vandal, but it is also kinda wrong to leave an innocent user banned. Maaaaaybe modifying the template wasn't needed, but the ban itself is wrong.

Thank you for listening, Admin. I...eh...I'll be grateful is there is some kind of reply...at least to know how this ends, but it isn't something indispensable, if you and the other Admins think it won't be needed.

Have a nice year! 