Thread:RubyTheMaster/@comment-4750363-20130605200748/@comment-5025667-20130611153213

Well, those are my personal gripes, anyway. I am sure that there may be other users who have their own complaints (mostly from what I assume is the admins personally?), but that is my main one.

I am sure that some pastas make it past the blacklist. One of my own made it past it, even though it is about one of the more famous pasta monsters (Zalgo, to be exact, but this might be because I didn't make it obvious enough), although in fear of another ban I won't mention its name, haha.

As I said, I can understand where the CP Wiki admins are coming from, as we get a lot of BEN, hyper-realism and mindless slaughterfests around these parts as well and we do tend to ban them if they are beyond the point of saving, some we give authors a chance to fix it. I personally never found any creepypasta involving Minecraft scary myself and you would have to have one hell of an imagination to try to find some scare factors into it.

Again, this is more from my own experiance, but how should Pokemon be handled? The quality of the pastas don't tend to stem from the subject of it, but more from the effectiveness in writing and whether (or how much) blood/gore it has. Whether a Pokepasta is good or not mostly comes from the individual authors themselves. Because H. Phone just posted in this thread, I would say that his pasta Ethan's Confession is probably one of the more original gaming pastas I've seen in general.

Either way, I am glad that my complaints were considered in a thoughtful and civil manner. I never really interacted with a CP Wiki admin personally, but I doubt that you guys are all that of which I've heard of. I always viewed things such as that as the small minority ruins the majority kind of deal, and from both reading pastas on the CP Wiki and here, I do believe that the same can be said for creepypastas.

Cheers!