Talk:Lobby 126/@comment-24082398-20160715223924/@comment-26874503-20160715225619

Thank you! This is very helpful. The end was a very challenging thought process for me, because there were so many ways it could have gone. A LOT of writing time was spent building up to something, but making an end that was satisfying and cohesive was something I did kinda miss in the writing process. There are a lot of subtleties that point to Chris kind of being responsible, but no big signs saying "HEY, CHRIS IS TOTALLY THE ANTAGONIST", which is really a matter of thought. You could choose to look at it as regular people's lives gone wrong, or you could look at it deeper, find the root cause, or the mastermind behind it all(You know, he DID run the chat). They do proclaim sam dead, which I did put in there, and I prefer to think that, but really it's not conclusive. The premise has been something I've worked on for a long time, way before I wrote this, but the ending was still a bit of a blur to me. Overall, I think that this wasn't the highest quality work I've done, and it was a style that I'm not used to (The unknowns and subleties). Most of my other work is in tales, events that happen, with no real question as to what's REALLY going on behind the curtains. I didn't major in writing, but its been something I do with my time. I agree with you, ending was a bit flat, but I'm really glad you found it an interesting read. Maybe I'll make a companion story, something to clear it up, or maybe I'll leave it. In general though, thanks for your criticism. It's really helpful ^_^